Spiritual information to learn

    • Official Post

    Sustainability of the individual

    --By Monjoronson--

    "Today’s lesson will center and emanate from the individual, from the era of preconception to conception, through the embryonic stage to birth and afterwards, until death."

    Sustainability of the individual.pdf

    The "TRUTH" doesn't know an expiration date! (-CL) -- I Am that I Am --

    Heed me, little ones, your Father calls to you gently. It is time now. Do you understand? Yes, I think you do. Will you come to me?

    I Love you tenderly and oh so dearly. Take my hand. Do it right now. This is urgent, ok? -- Christ Michael Aton --

    Message: https://christ52.stackstorage.com/s/ivMabM7p8EYJnKQ

    • Official Post

    "SATAN CLAUWS are back in town!"


    I AM Sananda.

    I come in service to Our Holy Father of Light, God/Aton and The Creation. Greetings, precious chela, Druthea. Let us begin.

    Many of you may wonder what Santa Claus has to do with the Anti-Christ. Everything! The Adversary to God in its wish to place bondage and limitation upon God's Human Creatures upon this plane knows that to garner the greatest degree of deception it must begin with the human in its childhood state.

    You see, the adversary, in order to maintain deceptive "control" over you ones, must support its “illusion” of attachment to "physical" matter. The being that so-called Christians have called Santa Claus represents the "god" (of the adversary) to your little children. For example: According to the "myth" (defined as, “An imaginary or fictitious person, thing, event or story.) Santa Claus can BE everywhere around this planet within a short 8-hour-or-so period. He will bring "gifts" to all the "good" children around the planet. These "gifts" are physical toys and objects of desire of the young and "good" child. If the child is really "good", he/she receives many gifts of which he/she has asked for. This begins the human's attachment to having "things" of material plane versus desiring the "spiritual" gifts of Our Creator, God/Aton.

    Now the parents, of course, support this Santa Claus "image", only it is not necessarily based upon the "goodness" of the child, but more directly based upon the pocket-book abilities of the parent. Since there is NO such being called Santa Claus as de­scribed in the "myth", it is THE PARENTS who perpetuate the lie of the adversary, by themselves continuously allowing, en­couraging and fulfilling the "I want. .. " list of their children. Essentially, regardless of the "good" intentions of the parents, they themselves are planting the seed of, encouraging and sus­taining "materialism" within their child. Those children whose parents cannot "afford" many gifts for their children most often feel "guilty". The child senses this and unless the parent ex­plains HONESTLY where the gifts come from, so that the child understands that it is not based upon his "goodness" or "badness" but that any "gifts" given are based upon the LOVE ­sharing of his parents (or whoever gives), he will begin "comparing" himself by that which he has not received, against what his "perceived" more abundant friends and peers receive. The child will most often begin to harbor feelings of unworthi­ness and eventually he may become quite ANGRY with his par­ents for allowing and supporting a LIE.

    Am I saying it is "wrong" to give gifts of material matter? Not at all. Parents, you must FIRST simply nurture and encourage the spiritual "gifts" of Our Creator, God/Aton; especially the spiritual creative potential within, personal responsibility, integrity of spirit within, Love and Joy of life and ONENESS with all. If Christmas represents a "time" when family and friends can be close in communion and sharing of LOVE, and a "time" of thankful appreciation for the gifts of LIFE of God and a "time" of remembering and giving back dignity to those who are less fortunate in physical manifestation, then God blesses you. Only, God, Our Father, and We of the HIS HOSTS OF LIGHT would encourage you to not save this "time" of sharing for ONLY societal designated "times such as Christmas. EV­ERY DAY IS HOLY AND BLESSED OF GOD! MAKE EV­ERY MOMENT A DIVINE, HOLY CHRISTED CELEBRA­TION WITHIN!

    I AM suggesting, though, that the "image" of "roly poly", Santa Claus who is "everywhere" ("like" God) is really the ANTI-­GOD's attempt at a very POOR copy of GOD. Santa Clause represents in his image figure, gluttony and his perceived "jolliness" and "benevolence” is really the ANTI-GOD laughing AT YOU because you parents play his game of seducing your own children into MATERIALISM and away from true SPIRITUALITY. The "myth" says, "Santa Claus" goes "everywhere" where the "good" children are. Do you think perhaps those starving ones, such as in Ethiopia and HERE within your own United States, are loved LESS by God/Aton? Well, Satan Claus only gives "gifts" to children who are "good" according to material desire AND ABILITY OF PARENTS TO PAY! Ponder this carefully.

    Parents, many of you have given "EVERYTHING" you could of material "desires" to your children, and when they are grown and still depend upon you in their adult years and then even re­sent you, you are baffled. Don't you see? When you give your child TRUTH and LOVE and GUIDANCE of SPIRITUAL INTEGRITY and ONENESS, THEY WILL HAVE GAINED ACCESS TO THE TOOLS WITHIN THEM TO BE RESPON­SIBLE CREATIVE HUMANS OF THIS PLANE. YOU MUST GIVE THEM TRUE "GIFTS" OF SPIRITUAL KNOWLEDGE AND POWER WITHIN THEM that they may move forward IN JOY AND INNER PEACE and FEAR NOT the challenges put before them, but instead WELCOME THEM as OPPORTUNITIES TO GAIN KNOWLEDGE AND UN­DERSTANDING OF TRUTH OF THEIR HOLY, DIVINE SPIRITUAL HERITAGE WITHIN!

    So what am I suggesting? Very plainly, that the “myth" of Santa Claus be presented HONESTLY to your children from the beginning. You need not continue to FEED THE LIE OF ANTI-GOD and thus, cripple your children by feeding them limitation and bondage to "material" objects. They must learn and KNOW that THEY create ALL within this experience, in­cluding any perceived "lack". You must teach your children RESPONSIBILITY for their thoughts, words and actions and DISCIPLINE of their "minds" by ALWAYS monitoring their own thoughts. For those of you parents who have already taught your children the "myth" of "Santa Claus", NOW is the time to "pop” the phony, gluttonous belly of Santa Claus to re­lease the "hot air" existing within this deceptive "satanic myth”. You see, "Satan" Claus is NOT an image of TRUE Christians. TRUE Christians are those who understand and adhere to CHRIST consciousness teachings of THE LAWS OF GOD AND THE CREATION, NOT so-called ones who label them­selves “Christian" based on their "belief" in what they are told are the "teachings" of Christ as presented erroneously within your various Bibles.

    SEE Santa Claus for that which this image truly represents: a ridiculous, gluttonous image to perpetuate COMMERCIALISM of' material "goods" and "services". Face it, precious ones, MANY businesses DEPEND upon your CHRISTMAS season for a major portion of their business. Just as the ANTI-GOD DEPENDS upon your IGNORANCE of Truth to perpetuate its EVIL FOLLY upon you. YOU feed the BEAST by your choice to remain spiritually ignorant.

    Many of you now may be concerned about YOUR BUSINESS, especially if yours is one which rides the MASS consciousness tide of Christmas giving. IF that be your FIRST concern and NOT about the integrity and necessity of YOUR product, then YOU need to PONDER YOUR priorities of concern more care­fully. If your business is truly one which serves your human brethren by truly SERVING GOD, then you need not concern over its success ... GOD'S WILL WILL BE DONE! But if your business rides upon MEDIA molded and created desires, addic­tions and "social" traditions….it may be time to carefully con­sider YOUR PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY to GOD, SELF and YOUR BRETHREN, and therefore, CHANGE your busi­ness! IMPOSSIBLE, YOU SAY?! NOTHING IS IMPOSSI­BLE WHEN YOU MAKE YOUR FIRM COMMITMENT TO SERVE IN BALANCE WHICH IS OF GOD/ATON AND THE CREATION. "Will it be easy to change", you ask? THAT depends upon YOU! Meaning it depends upon the degree of resistance and dependence upon the "material" plane of­fered and accepted by your "altered" ego which, of course, is fed by the Anti-God which YOU have allowed within YOUR TEMPLE OF GOD. Whether it is easy or not does NOT mat­ter. WHEN your commitment to GOD IS MADE AT SOUL LEVEL, YOUR SOUL WITHIN WILL BRING THE LESSONS TO STRENGTHEN YOUR SPIRITUAL CON­NECTION AND COMMITMENT TO GOD. IT WILL BE ENTIRELY UP TO THE SELF-DEVELOPED INTEGRITY WITHIN as to whether or not YOU are successful in YOUR TESTING to allow YOU entrance within GOD’S HOLY KINGDOM OF LIGHT. So Be it.

    I AM Sananda, ONE with GOD, in Service to God/Aton and The Creation. Thank you precious chelas for this communion. May you receive the clarity and understanding OF GOD, given herein. Bless you little sister, Druthea, for your service. Peace be with you. Salu.

    -- PJ 47 -- pag. 22 -- http://phoenix.abundanthope.org/all%20pj%20s.htm

    • Official Post

    EARTH-BIRTH DRAMA and More. (10)


    Jupiter was investigated by probes called Pioneer 10 and Pioneer 11 AND by the two Voyagers according to your public information allowed sharing with you in some portion. The results indicated that there were no differences than found at Saturn. The giant gaseous planet was found to emit immense amounts of radiation and heat and to be engulfed by a thick atmosphere that is subject to violent storms. Yet even this impenetrable envelope was found to be constituted primarily of hydrogen, helium, meth­ane, ammonia, water vapor, and prob­ably droplets of water; somewhere farther down inside the thick atmo­sphere there is liquid water, the scien­tists have concluded.

    As with Saturn, the moons of Jupiter proved more fascinating, re­vealing, and surprising than the planet itself. Of the four Galilean moons, Io, the closest to Jupiter, revealed totally unexpected volcanic activity. Al­though what the volcanoes spew is mostly sulphur based, the erupted material contains some water. The surface to Io shows vast plains with troughs running through them, as if they had been carved by running wa­ter. The consensus is that Io has "some internal sources of water".

    Europa, like Io, appears to be a rocky body, but it's somewhat lower density suggests that it may contain more internal water than Io. Its sur­face shows a latticework of vein like lines that suggested to the NASA teams shallow fissures in a sea of frozen ice. A close look at Europa by Voyager 2 revealed a layer of mushy water ice under the cracked surface. At the December 1984 meeting of the American Geophysical Union in San Francisco, two scientists of NASA's Ames Research Center suggested that under Europa's ice sheet there might exist warmer oases of liquid water that could sustain living organisms. After a reexamination of Voyager 2 pho­tographs, NASA scientists tentatively concluded that the spacecraft witnessed volcanic eruptions of water and am­monia from the moon's interior. The belief now is that Europa "has an ice covering several miles thick" overlay­ing an ocean of liquid water up to thirty miles deep, kept from freezing by radioactive decay and the friction of tidal forces. Eee-gads. Well, be glad Hatonn is presenting this infor­mation instead of Soltec (Senior Geo­physical authority) who sits to my right elbow and is about having a hemorrhage. Never mind, chelas, you have to have the idiot blither and speculation so that you can better appreciate the TRUTH.

    Ganymede, the largest of Jupiter's moons, appears to be covered with water ice mixed with rock, suggesting it has undergone moonquakes that have cracked its crust of frozen ice. It is thought to be made almost entirely of water ice, with an inner ocean of liquid water near its core. The fourth Galilean moon, Callisto—about the size of the planet Mercury—also has an ice-rich crust; under it there are mush and liquid water surrounding a small, rocky core. Estimates are that Callisto is more than 50 percent water. A ring discovered around Jupiter is also made mostly, if not wholly, of ice particles.

    Modern science seems to have confirmed the ancient assertion to the fullest: there indeed have been "waters ABOVE the Firmament".


    Jupiter is the Solar System's larg­est planet (visible)—as large as 1,300 Earths. It contains some 90 percent of the mass of the complete planetary system of the Sun. I suggest that when you come into "visibility" you will suddenly discover you are surrounded by unseen planets and stars. These ones would have been totally obscured by photons through which your vision was incapable of witness. As the entire system "speeds up" in fre­quency to accommodate these new "X-rays", you will find a whole uni­verse of wondrous new additions.

    As stated a bit earlier, the Sumerians called Jupiter KI.SHAR, "Foremost of the Firm Lands", of the planetary bodies. "Foremost"??? From whose perception might that be written? Saturn, though smaller than Jupiter, occupies a much larger por­tion of the heavens because of its rings, whose "disk" has a diameter of 670,000 miles. The Sumerians called it AN.SHAR, "Foremost of the Heav­ens". "Foremost"??? From whose perception might that be written? Ah so!

    Evidently the Sumerians knew what they were talking about?


    When you can view the Sun with the unclothed eye, say, at dawn or at sunset, it appears to be a perfect disk. Even when viewed with telescopes, it has the shape of a perfect globe. Yet the Sumerians depicted it as a disk with triangular rays extending from its round surface. Why?

    In 1980, astronomers of the High Altitude Observatory of the University of Colorado took pictures of the Sun with a special camera during an eclipse observed in a location in the country of India. The pictures revealed that because of magnetic influences, the Sun's corona gives it the appearance of a disk with triangular rays extend­ing from its surface--just as the Sumerians had depicted millennia ear­lier.


    In January of 1983 an author named ZECHARIA SITCHIN, born in Rus­sia and raised in Palestine, an Economics/History professor, brought this "enigmatic representation" which was on a Sumerian "cylinder seal" to the attention of the editor of Scientific American, a journal that reported the astronomers' discovery. In response, the editor, Dennis Flanagan, wrote to him on January 27, 1983:

    "Thank you for your letter of January 25.

    "What you have to say is most interesting, and we may well be able to publish it."

    "In addition to the many puzzles posed by this depiction," he had writ­ten in his letter, "foremost of which is the source of the Sumerian knowl­edge, is now their apparent familiarity with the true shape of the Sun's co­rona."

    Do you suppose it is the need to acknowledge the source of Sumerian knowledge THAT IS STILL HOLD­ING UP PUBLICATION OF WHAT 'SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN' HAS DEEMED "MOST INTERESTING'"? What would be your best guess?

    Dharma, allow us to close here at for the writing grows long. I wish to put the next couple of segments to tape this afternoon for we will get too far behind if we do not. The next segment begins to get really interesting so I would like to clear the backlog a bit if you would be able to make yourself available for that specific task. We will be taking up "The Messengers of Genesis" when we next write on the subject of the "Divine Plan".

    Hatonn to clear, please. Blessings rest upon you who are willing to see and hear for upon your shoulders rests the survival of a species. Salu.

    From: Phoenix LIBERATOR: Volume 19, Number 9. Transcription- AH.
    Link: http://phoenix.abundanthope.org/choice.htm

    • Official Post

    EARTH-BIRTH DRAMA and More. (9)


    What about these little invisible particles which can destroy your en­tire species in a period of time with no protection? I repeat—what about those "holes" wherein already are pouring these photon waves upon you? The government lies to you—you are mov­ing into the Photon Belt right on schedule and they are giving you hog­wash about "ozone holes" and non­sense about "skin cancers".

    Can man survive such a passage? Indeed, if care is taken for you will be under the influence of multiple "suns". This is why we encourage "clusters" of domes over covered by large "shade" domes so that most activities can be done without full-time exposure to these elements. Indeed, man can not only survive, but flourish in the pres­ence of such Light if handled prop­erly. After adjustment and a period of "mutation", plants and animals who dwell in the open will flourish incred­ibly well. Because of your adaptation to luxury indoor climate control, you are the ones at risk. This is, however, why the prophets will tell you that the animals will be quite well adjusted "outside" during that period of "Light" which would blind and burn your human bodies. Outdoor dwellers will also manage very well with a minimal eye protection. This, of course, is IF the human interferers keep out of the equation. If you ignite radioactive belts, etc., you will have other prob­lems with which to contend. Already a thrust for sunglasses which close out ultra-violet rays are marketed—why do you think this is so? Human can easily evolve protective changes if given a bit of "time" to do so—it is the suddenness which is devastating. As with any x-rays, protection of mini­mal amounts will be more than ad­equate. HOWEVER:


    NEXT BUG-A-BOO: One of the major reasons why the government will not allow you to be told of the upcoming Photon Belt is because STERILIZATION OF THE SPECIES will occur through exposure to the rays for ones who are exposed without protection. This will cause a massive drop in offspring in the immediate upcoming generation of population. How better to snuff out the prospec­tive "next generation"? There simply will only be the "select" few who will be able to have children.

    This is why the Revelation prophe­cies state that it will be most bad for ones who are with child—the mutations will abound in the first birthing of already forming bodies and recently conceived babes. There will be massive spontane­ous abortions and malformed births, most of which will not survive and in the hardships upcoming, will perish. There will be a massive annihilation of any surviving mutants.

    Again, chelas, ye become angry with ME; do you think I make up these tales to give you on "scare night at the movies"? The prophecies have been before you since the beginning of your planet.

    This is, however, why I suggest that as you move into the Photon Belt, you must also have facilities for protection of your "bearing" cattle, fowl, etc. Most will fare alright on their own but they, too, shall become sterile if left to exposure of great magnitude fora long period of time until adjustment can be accomplished. This would be neces­sary, at any rate, for the planet would be overrun by animals and the species of human would be destroyed in time.


    Next bugs-in-the BOO: The rays will destroy the brain functioning if not protected. If you cannot imagine a planet filled with dying, blind—and totally insane persons—I suggest you begin to do so NOW. Just as with continued doses of radiation, the brain cells are killed off and you will surely be back to a planet of dying humanity who can function only at "cave-man" level, if that efficiently. This is as much the reason for "dark ages" as anything that happens to a planet. This is what would cyclically depopu­late a planet in the natural order of things. This is why man "could" save selves but will not. Good news? Bad news? No, it just IS news. It should not be "news" for it is as old, likewise, as the beginning of the planet.

    Taking up again with snowflakes, let us continue. What was originally described as "a carousel of bright icy particles" was revealed, however, by data to consist of chunks of ice ranging from boulder size to that of "big houses". You are seeing "a sea of sparkling ice" said JPL's scientists. The ice, at some primordial time, had been liquid water. By the way, these are the SAME scientists who tested the material left by Semjase and Pleiadians with Billy Meier and "lost" the samples.

    The several larger moons of Sat­urn at which the three spacecraft took a look, appeared to have much more water, and not only in the form of ice. It was reported in 1979 that the group of inner moons of Saturn—Janus, Mimas, Enceladus, Tethys, Dione, and Rhea—appeared to be "icy bodies...consisting largely of ice". It was confirmed in 1980 that these inner satellites as well as the newly discov­ered moonlets were "spheres of ice". On Enceladus, which was examined more closely, the indications were that its smooth plains resulted from the filling in of old craters with liquid water that had oozed up to the surface and then frozen.

    It was also revealed that Saturn's outer moons were ice covered. The moon Iapetus, which has puzzled as­tronomers because it showed dark and bright portions, was found to be "coated with water ice" in the bright areas. Voyager 2 seemed to confirm in 1981 that Iapetus was "primarily a ball of ice with some rock in its center". The data, Von R. Eshleman of Stanford University concluded, indicated that Iapetus was 55 percent water ice, 35 percent rock, and 10 percent frozen methane. Saturn's largest moon, Ti­tan—larger than the planet Mercury—was found to have an atmosphere and a surface rich in hydrocarbons. But under them there is a mantle of frozen ice, and some sixty miles farther down, as the internal heat of this celestial body increases, there is a thick layer of water slush. Farther down, it is now believed, there probably exists a layer of bubbling hot water more than 100 miles deep. All in all, the Voyagers' data suggested that Titan is 15 percent rock and 85 percent water and ice.

    Is Saturn itself a larger version of Titan, its largest moon? Well, you could wait for future missions and see what they provide—or you can turn and study the Sumerian texts and KNOW NOW. It's up to you.

    Continuation next posting.

    • Official Post

    EARTH-BIRTH DRAMA and More. (8)

    Venus, likewise is believed to be waterless because of its relative prox­imity to the Sun. This one surprised the scientists for it was discovered by unmanned spacecraft, both American and Soviet, that the extremely hot surface of the planet (almost 900 de­grees Fahrenheit) was caused not so much by its proximity to the Sun as by a "greenhouse" effect: the planet seems to be enshrouded by what is presumed to be a thick atmosphere of carbon dioxide and clouds that contain sulfu­ric acid. As a result the heat of the Sun is trapped and does not dissipate back into space during the night. (Assum­ing, of course, that there is actually heat from the Sun—which there is not!) Through this assumption, how­ever, it would be recognized that an ever-rising temperature would have vaporized any water that Venus might have had. But did it ever have such water in its past? You see, as we travel along in the theories of "formation" and "what if s", it becomes more and more clear that man hasn't ANY NOTION OF WHAT REALLY IS! It is now pretty much speculated that Venus once had a lot of water.

    Interestingly enough, "the lost oceans of Venus" can be traced in its rocks—telltale signs of water flow, in fact. There was indeed water "below the Firmament"—not only on Earth but also on Venus as well.

    The latest scientific discoveries have now added Mars to the list of inner planets whose waters corrobo­rate the ancient statement. There exist "canals" on Mars and they can be seen through the telescopic lenses.


    Let us close this portion.

    Hatonn to clear and allow ponder­ing of this information that you might become balanced and perceptive in awareness. Salu.

    You ones must be in consideration of the investigations focused on other of your planets wherein you can see that things are not as were speculate, upon as being only a short while your past.

    Let us consider findings of the Mariner 9 which confirmed and aug­mented the results of the Viking 1 and Viking 2 missions launched five years later; they examined Mars both from orbiters and from landers that de­scended to the planet's surface. They showed such features as evidence of several flooding's by large quantities of water in an area designated Chryse Planitis; channels that once held and were formed by running water coming from the Vallis Marineris area; cycli­cal melting's of permafrost in the equa­torial regions; rocks weathered and eroded by the force of water; and evidence of erstwhile lakes, ponds, and other "water basins".

    Let us remember from those re­cordings from the probes that water vapor was found in the thin Martian atmosphere; Charles A. Barth, the principal scientist in charge of Mari­ner 9's ultraviolet measurements, es­timated that the evaporation amounted to the equivalent of 100,000 gallons of water daily. Norman Horowitz of Caltech reasoned that "large amounts of water in some form have in past eons been introduced to the surface and into the atmosphere of Mars", because that was required in order to have so much carbon dioxide (90 percent) in the Martian atmosphere. Then in publishing results of the Vi­king project, it was concluded that "a long time ago giant flash floods carved the Martian landscape in a number of places; a volume of water equal to Lake Erie poured... scouring great channels."

    The final NASA report after the Viking missions (Mars: The Viking Discoveries) concluded that "Mars once had enough water to form a layer several meters deep over the whole surface of the planet".

    How did they actually come to conclusions in agreement? They pro­jected that this was possible because Mars (like Earth) wobbles slightly as it spins about its axis. This action results in significant climatic changes every 50,000 years. When the planet was warmer it may have had lakes as large as Earth's Great Lakes in North America and as much as three miles deep. "This is an almost inescapable conclusion," stated Michael H. Carr and Jack McCauley of the U.S. Geological Survey in 1985. "1985"?

    How many years do you think there were up to 1985? Please, chelas, be in reasoning—conclusions drawn in 1985 are like "finally" being drawn this day and still, these are only "conclusions" and not proven points of fact.

    What I am trying to reach through to your reasoning mind and say, is that you can't have known very much after some cataclysmic happening occurred and caused a "dark ages" aboard your awn starship. These things are only now coming into your knowledge flow. Worse, however, the information is now balanced against that which is KNOWN from other resources of controlled information and fed to you in bits and pieces of erroneous, mixed with valid, information.

    The outcome of the joint scientific studies between the Soviets and the U.S.A. NASA regarding "Mars land­ings" conclude that some deep Mar­tian canyons are probably still flowing water in their depths, or at least just below the dry riverbeds. How quaint.

    What had started out as a dry and barren planet has emerged, in the past decade, as a planet where water was once abundant—not just passively ly­ing about but flowing and gushing and shaping the planet's features. Mars has joined Venus and Earth in cor­roborating the concept of the Sumerian texts of water "below the Firmament", on the inner planets.


    The ancient assertion that the as­teroid belt separated the waters that were below the Firmament from those that were above it implies that there was water on the celestial bodies that are located farther out. We have already reviewed the later discoveries which confirm the Sumerian descrip­tion of Uranus and Neptune as "wa­tery". What about the other two celestial bodies that are orbiting be­tween those two outer planets and the asteroid belt, Saturn and Jupiter?

    Saturn itself, a gaseous giant whose volume is more than eight hundred times greater than that of Earth, as described by scientists, has not yet been penetrated down to its surface—assuming it has, somewhere below its vast atmosphere of hydrogen and he­lium, a solid or liquid core. But its various moons as well as its breathtak­ing rings are now known to be made, if not wholly then in large part, of water ice and perhaps even liquid water. This is what your astronomers and scientific computer analysts say so surely you can believe them?

    They continue by telling you that originally, Earth-based observations of Saturn showed only seven rings; it is now known from space probes that there are many more, with thinner rings and thousands of ringlets filling the spaces between the seven major rings; all together they create the effect of a disk that, like a phonograph record, is "grooved" with rings and ringlets. The unmanned spacecraft Pioneer II established in 1979 that the rings and ringlets consist of icy mate­rial, believed at the time to be small pieces of ice a few inches in diameter or as small as snowflakes. But what of invisible photon rings? Whoever mentions these little perturbations?

    Continuation next posting.

    • Official Post

    EARTH-BIRTH DRAMA and More. (7)

    The continuing narrative of your Genesis does not describe the ensuing splitting up of Tiamat or the breakup of her host of satellites, described so vividly in the Mesopotamian texts. It is evident, however, from the above-quoted verses from Isaiah and Psalms, as well as from the narrative in Job (26:7-13), that the Hebrews were fa­miliar with the skipped-over portions of the original tale. Job recalled how the celestial Lord smote "the helpers of the haughty One", and he exalted the Lord who, having come from the outer reaches of space, cleaved Tiamat (Tehom) and changed the Solar Sys­tem:

    The hammered canopy

    He stretched out

    in the place of Tehom,

    The Earth suspended in the void;

    He penned waters in its dense­ness,

    without any cloud bursting....

    His powers the waters did ar­rest,

    His energy the Haughty One did cleave.

    His wind the Hammered Brace­let measured out,

    His hand the twisting dragon did extinguish.

    The Mesopotamian texts contin­ued from here to describe how Nibiru/ Marduk formed the asteroid belt out of Tiamat's lower half:

    The other half of her

    He set up as a screen for the skies;

    Locking them together

    as watchmen he stationed them....

    He bent Tiamat's tail

    to form the Great Band as a bracelet.

    Genesis picks up the primordial tale here and describes the forming of the asteroid belt thus:








    Realizing that the Hebrew word Shama 'im is used to speak of Heaven or the heavens in general, the editors of Genesis went into some length to use two terms for "the heaven" cre­ated as a result of the destruction of Tiamat. What separated the "upper waters" from the "lower waters", the Genesis text stresses, was the Raki 'a; generally translated "Firmament", it literally means "Hammered-out Brace­let". Then Genesis goes on to explain that Elohitin then called the Raki 'a, the so-called Firmament, Shama 'im , "the Heaven" —a name that in its first use in the Bible consists of the two words sham and ma 'im , meaning literally "where the waters were". In the creation tale of Genesis, "the Heaven" was a specific celestial location, where Tiamat and her waters had been where the asteroid belt was hammered out.

    That happened, according to the Mesopotamian texts, when Nibiru/ Marduk returned to the Place of Cross­ing—the second phase of the battle with Tiamat: "Day Two", if you wish, as the biblical narrative does.

    Are there scholars on your placement who have this information deci­phered correctly and in presentable form? Indeed, but they are not al­lowed coverage and books are re­moved from the libraries as soon as they are placed there. I won't aid and abet our enemies by giving that in­formation at this time and if some of you researching historians find same—PLEASE DO NOT RELAY THE INFORMATION ON TO US—YET. THIS IS THE MOST CRITICALLY OPPOSED INFORMATION WITHIN YOUR POLITICAL ELITE CIRCLES—LET US NOT ENDAN­GER THE VERY WRITERS WHO CAN GIVE YOU FREEDOM THROUGH TRUTH.


    The ancient tale is replete with details, each of which is amazing in and of itself. Ancient awareness of them is so incredible that its only plausible explanation, readers, is the one offered by the Sumerians them­selves—namely, that those who had come to Earth from Nibiru were the source of that knowledge. Modern astronomy has already corroborated many of these details and can no longer be actually hidden; by doing so, it indirectly confirms the key as­sertions of the ancient cosmogony and astronomy: the Celestial Battle that resulted in the breakup of Tiamat, the creation of Earth and the asteroid belt, and the capture of Nibiru/Marduk into permanent orbit around your Sun.

    Let's just look at one aspect of the ancient tale—the "host" of satellites, or "winds", that the "celestial gods" had.

    You now know that Mars has two moons, Jupiter sixteen moons and several more moonlets, Saturn twenty-one or more, Uranus as many as fifteen, Neptune eight. Until Galileo discovered with his telescope the four brightest and largest satellites of Jupi­ter in 1610, it was unthinkable that a celestial body could have more than one such companion—evidence Earth and its solitary Moon.

    But here we read in the Sumerian texts that as Nibiru/Marduk's gravity interacted with that of Uranus, the Invader "begot" three satellites ("winds") and Anu/Uranus "brought forth" four such moons. By the time Nibiru/Marduk reached Tiamat, it had a total of seven "winds" with which to attack Tiamat, and Tiamat had a "host" of eleven—among them the "leader of the host", which was about to become an independently orbiting planet, your eventual Moon.

    Another element of the Sumerian tale, of great significance to the an­cient astronomers, was the assertion that the debris from the lower half of Tiamat was stretched out in the space where she had once existed.

    The Mesopotamian texts, and the biblical version thereof in Genesis, are emphati4 and detailed about the formation of the asteroid belt—insist­ing that such a "bracelet" of debris exists and orbits the Sun between Mars and Jupiter. But your astrono­mers were not aware of that until the nineteenth century. The first realiza­tion that the space between Mars and Jupiter was not just a dark void was the discovery by Giuseppe Piazzi on Janu­ary 1, 1801, of a small celestial object in the space between the two planets, an object that was named Ceres and that has the distinction of being the first known (and named) asteroid. Hmm-mnn! Three more asteroids (Pallas, Juno, and Vesta) were discovered by 1807, none after that until 1845, and hundreds since then, so that almost 2,000 are known by now. Astronomers believe that there may be as many as 50,000 asteroids at least a mile in diameter, as well as many more pieces of debris, too small to be seen from Earth, which number in the billions.

    In other words, it has taken mod­ern astronomy almost two centuries to find out what the Sumerians knew 6,000 years ago.


    Even with this knowledge, the biblical statement that the "Hammered-out Bracelet", the Shama 'int—alias "the Heaven", divided the "waters which are below the Firmament" from the "waters which are above the Fir­mament" remained a puzzle. Now, what could the "Bible" be speaking of?

    You ones have known, of course, that Earth was a very watery planet, but it has been assumed that it is uniquely so. Many will undoubtedly recall science-fiction tales wherein aliens come to Earth to carry off its unique and life-giving liquid, water. So even if the ancient texts had in mind Tiamat's, and hence Earth's, waters, and if this was what was meant by the "water which is below the Firma­ment", what water was there to talk about regarding that which is "above the Firmament"???

    You know—don't you—that the asteroid belt had, indeed, as the an­cient text reported, divided the planets into two groups?

    "Below" it are the Terrestrial, or inner, Planets; "above" it the gas­eous, or Outer, Planets. But, except for Earth, the former had barren sur­faces and the latter no surfaces at all, and the long-held conventional wis­dom was that neither group had any water—excepting, of course, Earth.

    As a result of the missions of unmanned spacecraft to all the other planets except Pluto, you now know better. Mercury, which was observed by the spacecraft Mariner 10, I be­lieve, in 1974/75, is too small and too close to the Sun to have retained water, if it ever had any. There is no point in arguing the point herein for it is not the point of this JOURNAL to restructure all of your misperceptions. Size and closeness to the Sun have NOTHING to do with whether or not a planet has water. But—we shall go with what the scientist "think" they know and what is projected to you so that confusion is not the point instead of the tale unfolding.

    Continuation next posting.

  • This threads contains 154 more posts that have been hidden for guests, please register yourself or log-in to continue reading.

Participate now!

Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!